Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You have to ask if the Wales development system needs a serious overhaul'

Press Association

A number of prominent figures in Welsh rugby have asked some searching questions following their regions’ dismal start to the European Champions Cup season.

ADVERTISEMENT

These are led by widely-respected administrator and former Saracens and Harlequins boss Mark Evans who took to Twitter to register his concern.

“Awful weekend for all the Welsh teams,” he wrote.

“Given that, quite rightly, most of the players are home grown (like Scotland and Ireland) you have to ask if the development system (including schools, club, pro and union) needs a serious upgrade/overhaul. Unlike other factors that is controllable.”

Video Spacer

Offload episode 15

Video Spacer

Offload episode 15

He then qualified this by adding:

“Welsh teams have not challenged in European Cup for a while. Not pulling up too many trees in URC either. Some key factors in Welsh rugby set up aren’t within their own control. Best to concentrate on those that are.”

While Cardiff won some admiring comments for their contribution to an exciting Friday night contest in which Harlequins claimed a 36-33 win, with only one game remaining in this season’s abridged pool stage format, Dai Young’s club are still looking for their first win.

As a result of their much-publicised, ill-fated trip to South Africa, Cardiff have faced an extremely disrupted spell during which they went a significant period without any match action. They also opened their campaign against Toulouse with a hastily-compiled scratch line-up.

However, Ospreys – who this weekend lost 10-25 against visitors Racing 92 – are also winless following three rounds of European action. Their West Wales rivals Scarlets are in a similar situation after they were hammered 45-10 by high-flying Top 14 outfit Bordeaux Begles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dragons are also still searching for their opening European success following a 25-10 Challenge Cup setback in Italy against Benetton, while their league form is also a matter of major concern since they have registered only one United Rugby Championship win to date.

Former Wales and British & Irish Lions scrum half Mike Phillips also prompted plenty of debate with his Tweet (above).

This led a number of his followers to question whether Wales needs four regional sides, or if one in the east and one in the west would be a more successful option.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition, plenty pointed to the funding gap which exists between the French and Irish sides and Wales.

By contrast, former Wales international Steven Jones was quick to note the stream of home-grown players which the regions are producing for the national side.

“All this negativity regarding regional rugby is killing me,” he said.

“We have four regions full of young Welsh talent which can only be good for the future of our game. Would you rather watch regional teams full of overseas players, because that’s what everyone is pushing for.”

However, his message found only qualified support from another ex-Wales star Lee Jarvis who wrote:

“I would rather watch a team that can win games regardless of where they are from.

Some great youngsters coming through but they need experience around them to perform IMO. So much focus on 60 cap rule and team Wales it only benefits one party.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search