Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You have to start him again next week': Marcus Smith not to blame for England woes

Marcus Smith of England look on during the Guinness Six Nations Rugby match between England and France at Twickenham Stadium on March 11, 2023 in London, England. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Marcus Smith was handed a start by new head coach Steve Borthwick in place of Owen Farrell but Irish pundits have avoided laying blame on the Harlequins flyhalf.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith returned to the Premiership during the Six Nations bye week to get some minutes under his belt after featuring in short spurts off the bench for England since his first up start against Scotland.

After Smith starred in a brilliant performance against Exeter, Borthwick boldly elevated him back into the starting line-up to play France at Farrell’s expense, who led the side to two victories over Italy and Wales.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

After the 53-10 defeat to France, former Scotland head coach Matt Williams was reluctant to put blame on Smith’s shoulders with so many other areas of concern for England.

“You certainly can’t look at Marcus and say he was poor,” Williams said on Virgin Media Sport‘s post-game panel.

“I thought the No 9 who started, Jack van Poortvliet was as slow as a month of Sundays.

“He was taking an age to get the ball from the ruck to Smith, and that takes away his space.

“To even think about 9 and 10 is wrong. The 9 was slow, I will say that, he is not international standard in my opinion.

“They’ve got a real problem at 9 but there was so many other problems around the field.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Apart from the slow service from the scrumhalf, Williams said England’s loose forwards were ‘wiped off the park’ by the French trio of Gregory Alldritt, Charles Ollivon and Francois Cros.

The brutal French pack caused problems for England at the scrum and at the ruck where the home side were penalised for a number of infringements.

“The back row, as Andrew said, were just wiped off the park. The scrum was struggling, the breakdown was struggling. They were struggling in the backfield with the kicking game.

“Their defensive system was poor. They were missing tackles, they were getting around them left, right and centre, through them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And what about the 10? Let’s not blame the young man. There are multiple problems before we get to Smith.

“I thought he was competent but he is not even a story in that game.”

Ireland’s fullback Rob Kearney was impressed with the cameo from Farrell which gave England a short burst but ultimately backed Smith to retain the job for the next clash with Ireland.

He did not think it was a good idea to take the 10 jersey off Smith after just one opportunity to start.

“I was only just thinking does Farrell come back in next week,” Kearney said.

“For me when Farrell and Mitchell came on for that first immediate 10 minutes, there was a difference in England’s play.

“The pace was up, the energy was up, and then it tapered off a little bit.

“I said before the game that Farrell would always be in my starting XV, but as a head coach you’ve given a young kid his start.

“Is it the right thing now to take it back off him? If you want to really try and develop him and give him every opportunity to grow.

“I think you have to start him again next week.”

Related

Williams believed that Smith could flourish at international level if he was in the right system.

So far Smith has tried to fit alongside Farrell at 12 for most of his short international career with the start against France a rare opportunity to pull the strings by himself.

“The problem is the structure around him. If you put Smith in Ireland’s structure, he’d go brilliantly,” he said.

“The structure around the 10 has options, and we’ll see that tomorrow hopefully as we have all year with Johnny [Sexton].

“But he [Smith] hasn’t got those options, he hasn’t got that structure around him.

“When Mitchell came on, there was certainly a lot more spark, he was getting the ball faster and Farrell was calling more shots, there is no two ways about that.

“It looked better for a couple of minutes, but then it fell apart. That tells you there is whole lot of other problems.

“I think if you threw Marcus Smith out now that would be the worst possible thing you could do to the young man.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
l
lot 743 days ago

Blame the COACH and RFU. this is his team and his game plan. Record loss , Great job Sacking Eddie JOnes. WEll done and Congrats. did not take long. 🤣

f
finn 744 days ago

People keep treating Marcus Smith like he's the main character of rugby. Every article about him emphasises how young he is, and how we don't want to knock his confidence and how we need to help him grow as a player - but the same treatment is never extended to Jack van Poortvliet. JVP is three years younger than Smith, and is performing much better than Smith was at that age.

T
Taff 744 days ago

I agree, Smith was not to blame and Farrell was not the answer when he came on. I would drop Steward from team and put Watson at 15, get some pace in backs. JVP was rubbish, Mitchel wasn’t much better, but get some pace and power in forwards asap or Ireland will have a field day.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 47 minutes ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world
Search