Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You need to get the big decisions right, they have got that wrong'

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

Ex-England international Ugo Monye has slammed the standard of big-decision officiating in the Gallagher Premiership after London Irish were robbed of victory at the death at Harlequins on Saturday. The bottom-of-the-table Exiles were leading 24-21 when a controversial decision near the halfway line denied them the penalty that would have enabled them to see out the victory.

ADVERTISEMENT

With time slipping away in a 14-a-side match after each team has shipped a red card, a Harlequins attack from their 22 resulted in Andre Esterhuizen throwing the ball over his head in desperation just when it looked like he was about to be tackled into touch.

Benhard Janse van Rensburg jumped and gathered the ball only for Harlequins’ Charlie Matthews to collide with his opponent in the air, an incident that resulted in the London Irish midfielder landing awkwardly and smacking his head off the ground.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Play on was the immediate verdict from the referee Craig Maxwell-Keys and with Harlequins regaining possession, TMO Claire Hodnett told the official that it had been a fair contest as both players were in the air.

This left the commentators on BT Sport, who were broadcasting the match live, incredulous that a penalty hadn’t been given to London Irish. Instead, play continued until an intervention by an assistant referee halted the action so that the bloodied van Rensburg, who had rejoined the ongoing play after receiving some brief treatment, could be removed for a HIA.

That meant the game would restart with a Harlequins scrum and after they won a penalty, they elected to kick to the corner rather than go for a game-levelling three points off the tee. That decision worked in their favour as they mauled their way over for the win-clinching try but this outcome upset Moyne, who reviewed the van Rensburg incident in the company of presenter Craig Doyle following an interview with Harlequins boss Tabai Matson.

“Oh gosh, I haven’t seen the video yet,” said Matson, whose team had scored all its 26 points in the second half after trailing 0-14 at the interval. “We knew it was going to be close. We knew that some of the calls were going to be contentious… We watch each other with admiration and they [London Irish] will be gutted that they let that go but ultimately we have got a couple of calls at the end there that gave us an opportunity and we are just so happy we took in in desperation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

With the camera now going back on Doyle, the presenter said: “The big sigh from Tabai Matson there, he knows they got away it there. Ugo, should Irish have won that game? He [Matson] is never going to answer that one clearly… but it had to be a penalty. How was that not a penalty?”

“I genuinely don’t know, I haven’t got a clue,” shrugged a disbelieving Monye, a 2012 Premiership title winner with Harlequins. “The explanation was that both players had their hands on the ball. Charlie Matthews was nowhere near it. I’m sorry, but if I was London Irish I’d be fuming. You have got van Rensburg who, in my opinion, is in control of the ball. Charlie Matthews doesn’t touch the ball and he tackled van Rensburg, who hits the deck and then had to go off for a HIA.

“When you have multiple angles – and this by the way is not just about this (incident): I don’t want to exaggerate but in big games, you need to get the big decisions right. Harlequins were on the receiving end of a bad decision at Sandy Park with the forward pass which lost them the game, so maybe everything has balanced out.

“But big decisions in the most competitive league where everyone is beating everyone, you have to get them right and I have got to say it’s not just Maxwell-Keys in the middle but as a team of four (match officials), they have got that wrong. London Irish should have won,” added Monye before Doyle then asked: “Why has the TMO not called that in?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The TMO has called it in and said it is a fair competition and it is play on,” replied Monye. “Play on? The lad’s gone off for a HIA. Sometimes that can happen and just be a rugby incident. People might call me biased and all the rest of it but I’m saying this as a former Harlequins player, London Irish should have won today!”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
J
Joe 783 days ago

Maybe Glos should try this at the Stoop in a few weeks although knowing our luck fake blood will be used and it will backfire.

Hopefully a big fine coming their way too with the way their louts known as fans behaved at the final whistle. Thank goodness no Irish players got caught up in it all!

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 784 days ago

Where is that same energy the English bigots (i.e., the three commentators in this regard) gave to Rassie for blasting Berry or the Aussies for questioning Raynal? Can't have it both ways, my hypocritical maties :)

P
Poorfour 784 days ago

Ugo has spent a bit too much time listening to Dallaglio, methinks.

On the replay, CMK was in exactly the right position to watch it live, and Claire Hodnett reviewed it and saw no issue.

It ended with a bad outcome for van Rensburg, but referees make their decision on whether it was a legitimate contest for the ball, with the outcome only coming into play if there was foul play.

Matthews was committed to the jump before van Rensburg caught the ball and would have been in a position to contest it, therefore not foul play.

There was a very incident in the first half where Ben Loader collided with Nick David in the air, dislodged the ball that David had caught and recovered it before it hit the ground. Irish were allowed to play on and scored from the resulting passage of play.

If the earlier incident wasn’t a penalty, the later one wasn’t one either.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 40 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search