Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You shouldn't miss something as blatant as that': Why ex-All Black is unhappy with Papalii decision

Dalton Papalii of the Blues signals to take the points during the round 12 Super Rugby Pacific match between Crusaders and Blues at Orangetheory Stadium, on May 13, 2023, in Christchurch, New Zealand. (Photo by Peter Meecham/Getty Images)

Blues flanker Dalton Papalii was red carded in the 15-3 defeat to the Crusaders early in the second half but the sequence of events after the high shot has left ex-All Black John Kirwan scratching his head.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders backs combined brilliantly to put Leicester Fainga’anuku over in the corner for a try before match officials went back to review Papalii’s challenge on Richie Mo’unga three phases earlier.

The review showed Mo’unga was hit high but that his pass was dropped by prop Tamaiti Williams before being recovered by Crusaders flanker Tom Christie some 10 metres downfield.

Nic Berry’s ruling at the time was ‘back off the chest’ which was never looked at under the review for the high tackle.

As a result, Papalii was yellow carded, which was later upgraded to a red, and the Crusaders’ try unlawfully stood despite a knock-on in the passage, which gave them a 15-3 lead.

“That is a pretty ridiculous decision actually,” Kirwan explained of the miss on Sky Sport NZ.

“The yellow card was merited, but there was a knock-on, you had to come back for the knock-on that Tamaiti Williams did.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That’s a critical moment in the game. I think the referees have to go away and look at that. You shouldn’t miss something as blatant as that.

“Head high, yeah I get that, but that is a knock-on. You come back for the head high, it is a yellow card.

“But we play on here and that’s a try. So that’s a really difficult moment at this level.”

The 14-man Blues were still able to muster a try-scoring opportunity in the 70th minute when Beauden Barrett produced a piece of magic.

Three kicks in succession had the Blues in position to score when the bounce stumped Barrett just metres from the try line.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blues would have just been seven points adrift had the correct ruling been made earlier.

“In saying that, I just think the Crusaders were relentless in the first half,” Kirwan said.

“The Blues will go away, and their defence was great, but late in the second half they needed one of those moments that Beauden nearly pulled off.”

The visitors fell to fifth on the Super Rugby ladder while the Crusaders moved into third momentarily until the Brumbies play on Sunday afternoon.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
h
hayden 587 days ago

Irrespective of being a blues fan (they played like garbage and deserved to lose, knock on or not), Nic Berry had time and time again proved himself at blatant misses or terrible decision making in big games and yet he's on the world cup panel. The rot goes all the way to the top it seems

f
frandinand 587 days ago

Why do people like Ben Smith continually quote JK. He is probably the most biased commentator around.
It might help Ben if you did some analysis based on your own observations instead of parroting a man who arguably was the worst NZ super rugby coach ever.

J
Jason 587 days ago

Looking at how bad match fixing is in all major sports.
Why do we assume rugby is free of cancer?

Considering the refs word on the field is law and world rugby will always protect him.

You would think he's the perfect target for unscrupulous bookies.
A single point of ultimate control

E
Euan 587 days ago

Some refs have blinkers on. Rugby is seriously in need of the Captain's challenge, which works so well in the NRL. Rubgy's refusal to use it can only be out down to snobbery.

J
Jan 587 days ago

Maybe the blues were preorganised to lose! Referee bias? Or coaches colluding?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search