Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You would've thought there was no chance... But that's what we've done'

By PA
Steve Borthwick /PA

Steve Borthwick hailed his Leicester Tigers side for defying expectations after they completed the job against Clermont Auvergne with a 27-17 win to reach the Heineken Champions Cup quarter-finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leading 29-10 from the first leg, tries from Hanro Liebenberg, Matt Scott and Freddie Steward – as well as a penalty try – ensured the hosts were never in danger at Mattioli Woods Welford Road.

Clermont also crossed twice in the second half through Alivereti Raka and Fritz Lee, but they were nothing more than consolation scores despite Tigers having Ollie Chessum sent off.

Video Spacer

Meafou on NFL, League & Union

Video Spacer

Meafou on NFL, League & Union

And after watching his side cruise into the last eight with a 56-27 aggregate win, Borthwick admitted no one would have predicted such a result at the start of the season.

“It’s a great result, isn’t it? Who would’ve thought we’d beat Clermont,” he said.

“We had two games and we won two games. If you look back at the start of the season, who would’ve thought Leicester Tigers would be European Champions Cup quarter-finalists.

“You would’ve thought there was no chance of that. But that’s what we’ve done. The players deserve enormous credit for what they’ve done.

“I thought at half-time there were some things we needed to do better in the second half. I thought the players did that very well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

On man-of-the-match Harry Potter, Borthwick added: “He’s done a good job for us. He’s played on the left wing for us before and there was plenty of players who really fought out there exceptionally hard.

“I thought the impact of the players coming on to the pitch was also very good.”

Tigers are through to the Champions Cup quarter-finals for the first time since 2016 and Clermont head coach Jono Gibbes felt his side were always fighting a losing battle after the first leg.

He said: “The total aggregate, obviously there’s a difference between them and us.

“I thought through the two games we had opportunities and maybe the differential could’ve been a little bit different if we’d taken our opportunities last week.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But, ultimately, we need to start working on bridging the gap between where we are and where we want to get to. Today was a great experience for us.

Related

“I think they’re just a little bit more efficient in how they do things. Even in the way they exit, they can shift the point, one pass, chase lines already in place.

“It was important for us to have a response. They scored five tries, three off set-piece, two off high-balls, at our home ground last week.

“No matter which stage of the evolution teams are in, for us that’s pretty hard to ship 29 points at home. So there was a response demanded and I thought the guys turned up.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
l
lot 979 days ago

Come on. Leicester tigers is expected to make the european quarter. if not for England rugby, then at least for some credibility to being leader at premiership. it would be too humiliating for england rugby to have the top Club kicked out at pool levels.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search