Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You'll never, ever, see that again': Ex-Bok coach vows 'primary school' errors won't return

Will Jordan of New Zealand makes a run during The Rugby Championship match between the New Zealand All Blacks and South Africa Springboks at Mt Smart Stadium on July 15, 2023 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

Former Springboks assistant coach Swys de Bruin has offered a passionate but honest review of South Africa’s performance at Mt Smart against the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

De Bruin gave a detailed critique of the parts of the Springboks’ DNA that were ‘never there’ in Auckland as ‘primary school errors’ resulted in a disappointing start which allowed the home side to go up 17-0.

He explained that critical parts of the game plan were ‘not typically us’ as he reviewed the opening 20 minute passage.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We can say 50-50 calls, we can say all these things,” de Bruin said on SuperSport TV‘s Final Whistle show.

“I want to come back to my earlier point, there are a few things that happened that is not typically us.

“We pride ourselves when we kick a ball, we put on the best chase line that you can have. They plan that in the system.”

Will Jordan’s first return came off a quick lineout following the Boks’ first exit kick from Willie le Roux.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Black No 14 found just one defender in the chase line, Faf de Klerk, and cut back towards the blind side to rip off a huge gain.

“Here there is a single rabbit chasing, that’s Faf, that’s good. Normally behind him there is a full on line, they shout ‘lines’ and the call is up.

“You space yourselves and don’t let anyone come under attack against you. For the kickers, it is vital that it has to be a pressure kick.

“You don’t just rush like a mad donkey, you make sure your spacing is perfect. Now for me, you’ll never, ever, see that again from a Springbok side, a chase like that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You’ll never ever, it’s a scattered line, it’s really primary school stuff.”

Following Jordan’s electric return the All Blacks returned to a shape to play to the openside, running a pod off Beauden Barrett at first reciever.

The typical line speed came from South Africa to pressure the pod and Barrett, but there were mistakes made leading to Shannon Frizell bursting up the middle.

“Now we rush up, that’s typically our defence but there is a dog leg [staggered rush line], normally the middle guy leads it and he’s the head of that spear defence.”

The middle defender, Lood de Jager, was caught behind his outside men, allowing Frizell the space and time to use some footwork to beat him.

“One thing after the other, it’s not us,” de Bruin explained.

“The scrums, the mauls, the pressure on the kick, that’s our DNA. That’s what we stand for and that was never there.”

On the phase before the All Blacks’ second try to Frizell, Beauden Barrett utilised a chip kick in behind which he regathered after an awkward bounce.

De Bruin broke down the sweeper defence system which left ‘way too much’ space due to perhaps a communication issue.

“You will not find the space to chip into, what happened? Let’s have a look,” he said.

“Faf, in that situation there, if he is on the blind, they’ve got a planned sweeper with one of the wingers to cover the chip kick.

“If you look at this one, Faf is stuck on the blind, here comes the kick and that vacuum is way too wide for a typical Springbok side. Way, way, too wide.”

De Bruin went as far to question whether the Boks were intentionally offering the All Blacks the invitation.

“I don’t know if they wanted to show that space, but that’s just not good enough. How can you lose seven field kicks Robbie?

“Every time it went to the rub of the green it went to the All Blacks.

Having neutralised the Springboks line speed by regathering the chip kick, Jordan attacked two props by the ruck to make a half-break before flinging the ball wide where Frizell was stationed on the touchline.

“Again there, terrible defence line, no system, they are chasing shadows. Suddenly the All Blacks look brilliant, and they were,” he said.

“I’m not saying they were not brilliant, but in any fight, I can’t fight with my hands behind my back.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
B
Bob Marler 489 days ago

I don’t know what the boks we’re trying to do on Saturday. But it was shit to watch.

It was almost as if they were trying to make the game as hard for themselves as possible. Horrendous exits. Virtually NO kicks at all. Uncontested line outs.

It reminded me of my u15C career. When our coach banned us from kicking and instructed us not to contest the line outs.

And the All Blacks played great rugby. So I guess it could have been far worse and/or couldn’t get worse.

B
Bob Marler 489 days ago

Aha. So I can become a writer/pundit… all I need to do is transcribe other pundits on the Telly…

C
CT 491 days ago

That's a lot of analysis,in laymen terms the Boks sucked the hind tit for the first twenty minutes

l
liz 492 days ago

Primary school stuffs 😂

S
Silk 492 days ago

The All Blacks were brilliant. Give them credit.
Lots of experimentation with selections going on at the moment.
The Boks will be back for sure.

A
Alexander 492 days ago

So , what you are assuming, is that the Boks should have won?

R
Ross 492 days ago

It's always easy to analyze a game afterwards .. eg hindsight is a wonderful thing. The fact is the Boks were outplayed. Yes they will learn from this game so will the ABs

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search