Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'You'll never, ever, see that again': Ex-Bok coach vows 'primary school' errors won't return

Will Jordan of New Zealand makes a run during The Rugby Championship match between the New Zealand All Blacks and South Africa Springboks at Mt Smart Stadium on July 15, 2023 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

Former Springboks assistant coach Swys de Bruin has offered a passionate but honest review of South Africa’s performance at Mt Smart against the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

De Bruin gave a detailed critique of the parts of the Springboks’ DNA that were ‘never there’ in Auckland as ‘primary school errors’ resulted in a disappointing start which allowed the home side to go up 17-0.

He explained that critical parts of the game plan were ‘not typically us’ as he reviewed the opening 20 minute passage.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

“We can say 50-50 calls, we can say all these things,” de Bruin said on SuperSport TV‘s Final Whistle show.

“I want to come back to my earlier point, there are a few things that happened that is not typically us.

“We pride ourselves when we kick a ball, we put on the best chase line that you can have. They plan that in the system.”

Will Jordan’s first return came off a quick lineout following the Boks’ first exit kick from Willie le Roux.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Black No 14 found just one defender in the chase line, Faf de Klerk, and cut back towards the blind side to rip off a huge gain.

“Here there is a single rabbit chasing, that’s Faf, that’s good. Normally behind him there is a full on line, they shout ‘lines’ and the call is up.

“You space yourselves and don’t let anyone come under attack against you. For the kickers, it is vital that it has to be a pressure kick.

“You don’t just rush like a mad donkey, you make sure your spacing is perfect. Now for me, you’ll never, ever, see that again from a Springbok side, a chase like that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You’ll never ever, it’s a scattered line, it’s really primary school stuff.”

Following Jordan’s electric return the All Blacks returned to a shape to play to the openside, running a pod off Beauden Barrett at first reciever.

The typical line speed came from South Africa to pressure the pod and Barrett, but there were mistakes made leading to Shannon Frizell bursting up the middle.

“Now we rush up, that’s typically our defence but there is a dog leg [staggered rush line], normally the middle guy leads it and he’s the head of that spear defence.”

The middle defender, Lood de Jager, was caught behind his outside men, allowing Frizell the space and time to use some footwork to beat him.

“One thing after the other, it’s not us,” de Bruin explained.

“The scrums, the mauls, the pressure on the kick, that’s our DNA. That’s what we stand for and that was never there.”

On the phase before the All Blacks’ second try to Frizell, Beauden Barrett utilised a chip kick in behind which he regathered after an awkward bounce.

De Bruin broke down the sweeper defence system which left ‘way too much’ space due to perhaps a communication issue.

“You will not find the space to chip into, what happened? Let’s have a look,” he said.

“Faf, in that situation there, if he is on the blind, they’ve got a planned sweeper with one of the wingers to cover the chip kick.

“If you look at this one, Faf is stuck on the blind, here comes the kick and that vacuum is way too wide for a typical Springbok side. Way, way, too wide.”

De Bruin went as far to question whether the Boks were intentionally offering the All Blacks the invitation.

“I don’t know if they wanted to show that space, but that’s just not good enough. How can you lose seven field kicks Robbie?

“Every time it went to the rub of the green it went to the All Blacks.

Having neutralised the Springboks line speed by regathering the chip kick, Jordan attacked two props by the ruck to make a half-break before flinging the ball wide where Frizell was stationed on the touchline.

“Again there, terrible defence line, no system, they are chasing shadows. Suddenly the All Blacks look brilliant, and they were,” he said.

“I’m not saying they were not brilliant, but in any fight, I can’t fight with my hands behind my back.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
B
Bob Marler 613 days ago

I don’t know what the boks we’re trying to do on Saturday. But it was shit to watch.

It was almost as if they were trying to make the game as hard for themselves as possible. Horrendous exits. Virtually NO kicks at all. Uncontested line outs.

It reminded me of my u15C career. When our coach banned us from kicking and instructed us not to contest the line outs.

And the All Blacks played great rugby. So I guess it could have been far worse and/or couldn’t get worse.

B
Bob Marler 613 days ago

Aha. So I can become a writer/pundit… all I need to do is transcribe other pundits on the Telly…

C
CT 615 days ago

That's a lot of analysis,in laymen terms the Boks sucked the hind tit for the first twenty minutes

l
liz 615 days ago

Primary school stuffs 😂

S
Silk 616 days ago

The All Blacks were brilliant. Give them credit.
Lots of experimentation with selections going on at the moment.
The Boks will be back for sure.

A
Alexander 616 days ago

So , what you are assuming, is that the Boks should have won?

R
Ross 616 days ago

It's always easy to analyze a game afterwards .. eg hindsight is a wonderful thing. The fact is the Boks were outplayed. Yes they will learn from this game so will the ABs

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 1 hour ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world
Search