If you were being picky about it, this season’s Six Nations should technically be called the Seventeen Nations given how many countries have supplied players for it.
The squad passports register places of birth as exotic as Cameroon, Buenos Aires and Sydney.
The diaspora is a bone of contention for some – especially England supporters who dearly wish Duhan van der Merwe had never left South Africa. There will be more grumbles from the same quarter this weekend if James Lowe leaves a similar size-imprint for Ireland at Twickenham.
But, really, the diverse make-up of the championship is merely keeping step with the world around it.
Nationality is at the core of the Six Nations – it is what is written on the tin after all – but on a shrinking planet, who belongs where is an increasingly multi-layered business.
Globalisation is moving the pieces around the board like never before.
Look at the England squad. Marcus Smith was born in Manila, Ethan Roots Auckland and Sam Underhill Ohio; Manu Tuilagi spent the first 12 years of his life in Samoa.
Of the initial squads assembled for this Six Nations, 56 players were born outside the country that picked them. Twenty-five of those were from other Six Nations countries – the sort of border raids prompted by neighbourly genealogy that have always taken place – but more from further afield.
Far-flung additions to the championship are not an entirely new phenomenon. After scoring one the great Twickenham tries against New Zealand on his England debut, Prince Alexander Obolensky – son of what is now St Petersburg – played in the 1936 tournament.
Of blue-blooded Russian stock, he ended up in London as a refugee after his family fled following the Bolshevik revolution. He wasn’t even a naturalised British citizen when he went three-quarters of the length of the field to score against the All Blacks.
Obolensky was an interesting one-off but in more recent times the international rugby arrivals lounge has become ever more crowded.
Is this a bad thing? Some fear it dilutes an international side’s identity, especially in the case of residency-qualified players.
World Rugby was probably right to clamp down on the project player phenomenon when it increased the qualification period in 2022 from three years to five years but there is no need to go any further.
It is not as if Six Nations games are in danger of turning into New Zealand A v South Africa A.
Is nationality transferable? A supporter might instinctively think not. You want a particular nation to win the Six Nations and that’s it. You don’t change allegiances season by season. By a curse of geography or family indoctrination you have your side for life.
When you look at the Ireland side that is sweeping all before it with three adopted Kiwis at its core there is no sense of a wishy-washy green. Exactly the opposite, in fact.
The commitment to the cause of Lowe, Jamison Gibson-Park and Bundee Aki – none of whom have a drop of Irish blood in them – is unquestionable.
Is nationality transferable? A supporter might instinctively think not. You want a particular nation to win the Six Nations and that’s it. You don’t change allegiances season by season. By a curse of geography or family indoctrination you have your side for life.
But maybe it is more fluid than you might imagine. It was instructive listening to Chandler Cunningham-South at England’s training camp in York last week.
He was born in Sidcup so, you would surmise, he is playing for the correct country in England. But had things worked out in New Zealand in his teens he could well have been an All Black.
Having moved there with his family at four, all his rugby – and life – experiences up to the age of 18 were in New Zealand. His friends and teammates were all Kiwis. Even his accent was Kiwi.
If the All Blacks route opened up it would have made perfect sense for him. It was only because the Crusaders could not find a spot for him that he returned to England.
Sliding doors.
Playing rugby for one nation or another in this day and age is not the hard and fast choice some would want us to believe.
The call that has attracted the most column inches this season has been that of Manny Feyi-Waboso.
Cardiff–born, his declaration for England irritated Wales supporters but that is the nature of the beast with dual-qualified players.
For every Feyi-Waboso, who qualifies for England through his grandparents, there is a Nick Tompkins, who plays for Wales through the same pathway.
He had the choice and he chose England.
For every Feyi-Waboso, who qualifies for England through his grandparents, there is a Nick Tompkins, who plays for Wales through the same pathway.
Leicester wing Ollie Hassell-Collins spoke recently of the possibility of following suit one day – even though he played for England in last year’s championship.
The door is open after the 2021 law change which made it possible to represent more than one country.
This championship has provided examples of this in action.
Alec Hepburn, who was born in Australia, has turned out for Scotland having previously been capped by England.
Again, this is a problem for some but why exactly? He qualifies – his father is a Glaswegian – so why not?
The same goes for his Scotland teammate and former Wallaby Jack Dempsey thanks to his grandfather.
It is of no benefit to rugby to lock good players out of top competitions.
Whether you like the idea of the Six Nations being multinational or not, it remains emphatically the Six Nations.
It is not as if there is some club-style transfer system in place which enables players to jump ship and follow the highest offer every summer. There is a three-year stand-down period in place before a player can pull on another country’s shirt – and it has to be one they qualify for through bloodline.
The modernisation of the regulations fits the reality of a changed environment. Little Englanders, Irelanders or Scotlanders take note – the world has moved on.
The fact is whether you like the idea of the Six Nations being multinational or not, it remains emphatically the Six Nations.
Tune in this weekend you will be left in no doubt that whatever the cast list, it remains an affair of the heart.
Look at these proud nations trying their best to get a pathway for their young men. Warning NZ rugby (aka the Pacific Lions) are circling. Wonder how many the world will let them grab?
Recently Moana Pasifika and Oceania Rugby U20s held a Competition at North Harbour Stadium. Where Moana Pasifika, Tonga, Fiji and Samoa U20s teams play each other in Auckland.
I need to tell these men, they probably already know that their Greatest threat comes from New Zealand. It will impact on your planned pathway of player development.
The Pacific Lions are long time poaches of PI players. Please stop, NZ this group want their players to wear their own jersey not yours. Bet NZ scouts were in a frenzy.
General Manager of Oceania Rugby, Frank Puletua
CEO of Moana Pasifika, Pelenato Sakalia
Elite Pathways & Performance Manager of Fiji Rugby, Bill Gadolo
CEO of Lakapi Samoa, Vincent Fepuleai
CEO of Tonga Rugby Union, Aisea Aholelei
Moana Pathways Manager, Leasiosiofaasisina Kevin Senio
JUST look how proud these nations are, world should watch how many get cherry picked.
The Oceania Rugby U20s Challenge will serve as a viable competition pathway opportunity for age-grade players across the Pacific to advance into the elite professional environment of Moana Pasifika and Fijian Drua.
In 2024, the competition will feature Fiji, Samoa and Tonga, alongside a Moana Pasifika invitational U20s team. The partnership vision is intended to include all other Pacific Unions with Under 19/20 age-grade programs, such as Papua New Guinea, Cook Islands, Solomon Islands, and the French Polynesian territories in an inclusive approach to also provide these unions with an exciting pathway opportunity.
The new competition will also serve as a qualifier for Samoa and Tonga for the 2024 World Rugby U20s Trophy to be played in Scotland from 2-17 July. The winner between the two Pacific foes in round two will advance as Oceania’s representative to this key event.
Moana Pasifika, renowned for its commitment to promoting and celebrating Pacific culture, will proudly host the tournament at North Harbour in Auckland. The matches will take place on Tuesday, 27 February, with the second round starting on Saturday, 2 March, culminating with the final round on Wednesday, 6 March.
The competition not only highlights the immense talent and passion for rugby in the Oceania region but also provides a platform for young players to shine on an international stage. The Oceania Rugby Challenge aims to foster growth, development, and camaraderie among the participating nations while also promoting the sport of rugby in the region.
General Manager of Oceania Rugby, Frank Puletua said:
“This unique blend of athleticism, creativity, and cultural pride promises to showcase our region’s top rugby talent in a traditional hub for Pasifika communities”
CEO of Moana Pasifika, Pelenato Sakalia said:
“It’s an exciting opportunity for our youth. It is a privilege for us to serve our Pacific nations. This is an opportunity to accelerate our pathways programs. It’s also an opportunity to unify Moana Pasifika with community rugby and the home nations U20 programs. We’re focused on running a successful competition.”
Elite Pathways & Performance Manager of Fiji Rugby, Bill Gadolo said:
“The Fijian pathway focuses on developing our age-grade talent for the modern game, including travel exposure, adaptability, and short turnaround tournaments. We welcome Oceania Rugby and Moana Pasifika for taking the initiative to engage Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, and Moana Pasifika. The team’s success against the three teams in Auckland is a measure of their readiness for the Aotearoa Super Competition U20s competition and, importantly, the World Rugby U20s Championship. The preparation began in December last year, and the squad was selected in early January. The Fijian Drua’s inclusion and the Fiji Under 20s’ spot in the World Rugby U20s Championship have attracted many players of Fijian descent worldwide.”
CEO of Lakapi Samoa, Vincent Fepuleai said:
“The Oceania Rugby U20s Challenge is a great initiative, and I would like to acknowledge Oceania Rugby and Moana Pasifika for making this happen. It offers young players in our development program both competition and a pathway to a contract with Moana Pasifika. This is a crucial step in nurturing our local talent, and we are really excited about these opportunities. Our HP Coaches have organised trials, with over a hundred local players participating, and we are excited about the selected talent to lead Samoan rugby into the future.”
CEO of Tonga Rugby Union, Aisea Aholelei said:
“Tonga Rugby Union is ecstatic that teams like Fiji, Samoa, and Moana Pasifika will be participating in this competition. This tournament solidifies our player pathways and motivates our local talent to don the Junior Ikale Tahi jersey. Knowing that they’ll be playing against the best in the Pacific and gaining vital international experience to improve their game. The players performances will indicate our development program international standing, highlighting the requirements to qualify for the top nations and tournaments. Our main objective is to identify the best development systems to help our talents reach their full potential, and this tournament will greatly benefit our future growth plans and programs.”
Moana Pathways Manager, Leasiosiofaasisina Kevin Senio said:
“This will be a massive boost for the future of rugby. This is about creating a genuine pathway and providing the stage for our up-and-coming Pasifika talent to be seen.”
Holy heck dude
You’re talking to this group of players like they shouldn’t have their own idea of what they want. Are you trying to influence them as if you’re there peer?
Finally WR decided to spend some of those millions in the pacific though it seems, about bloody time!?
I can not find the source, I will and add later. It is evidence based, fact not made up.
BUT of all the tier one nations the country with the most players is……
…….
England.
I was surprised by that others are NZ, SA, Samoa, Fiji, Tonga etc.
Thinking about it England probably have the most playing numbers in the world so it makes sense.
But SA the Bokke are 100% their own team.
where as NZ is the Pacific Lions (10-20% at times other non NZ born PI players) - Not fair.
England has always reported the most rugby players. Not sure if that’s still the case, with both France and SA booming. The Pacific Islands like NZ are way down the list.
Two reasons boks are their own, their economy and population. SA doesn’t have the economy to attract players or even immigrants. They have a population that saturates their game and country, so they don’t even need foreign players in their team and no one really wants to go there anyway.
England, France, even Ireland, can buy players in, and just don’t seem to be as good as “rougher” nations (I’d really argue selecting foreigners due to their form more of a hinderance for their performance). *Ireland has always seemed to have great numbers but obviously their population is nowhere near as big as the other two.
Still very hard to judge one countries reporting v another if you ask me.
maybe Raiwalui World Rugby High Performance Pathways and Player Development Manager can stop this BS from the Pacific Lions,
poaching from Fiji
Bula
Interesting piece. However, I believe fans are perfectly entitled to feel confusion and frustration at the current state of international eligibility laws. Obviously nationality and identity are not static and can change over time (Finlay Christie was born in Scotland and moved to NZ when he was 7. He’s both a Scot and a Kiwi and is totally entitled to it). The problem arises when the rules are made up in a way that favor some countries over others in a very obvious way. Let me explain.
You can play for a country if you are born there or have lived most of your life there (ie went to school there). That’s obvious. You can also play for one of your parent’s birthplaces, which seems fine to me as the connection is evident. The grandparent rule is where it all gets murky, as it really helps players who are born in a country with lots of historic immigration from countries that play rugby, such as NZ, AUS and SA players with British or Irish forebears. Then there’s the residency rule, which motivates lots of players to move to a different country with a professional competition with an eye in qualifying for their national team. Think Aki, Lowe, Gibson-Park, Halaholo, McNicholl, Flutey, etc, or the complete Japan roster who at the last RWC had 50% of players born abroad and 1/3 of the players raised elsewhere. Then you also have players who are attracted through scholarships to go to school and qualify, a tactic NZ uses with gusto (think Taukeiaho, Reece, Fekitoa, Naholo, etc).
Why does this matter? Because it skews professional rugby. Take for example the case of Chile, who qualified for their first World Cup ever with a squad assembled from Selknam, the semi pro outfit that was built with the best amateur players in the local competition, all of them born or raised in the country. And they have to play Samoa, a team where only 15% of the squad were home grown (most of them were born and raised in NZ or AUS), even having former All Blacks and Wallabies in Luatua, Lealiifano, and Sopoaga. How is this fair? How does this help rugby grow in other countries and markets?
I’m all for multiculturalism and free migration around the world. Maro Itoje’s parents are Nigerian but he was born and raised in England, he’s as English as complaining about the weather. But the moment you see three born and raised kiwis playing for Ireland, or 4 born and raised South Africans starting for Scotland, I don’t think it is crazy to complain about where international rugby is going.
Your arguments are just as illogical. It’s unfair that Chile has 20m people to select from when Samoa only has 1 million.
And pay your respects. The only reason Chile may have got motivation to form a professional team could be down to the example countries like Samoa have set on the world stage.
The best advice you can take is to think of international rugby as reflective of who you are rather than where you are, and that you may be drawing some misconceptions of what it is from football. Footballs laws are just as arbitrary as rugby’s and by no means gospel.
My particular opinion is NZ with all their money and all their “best systems” and all their best pundits and fans etc they poach PI players, who need the money and will run at a brick wall for them no questions asked about their health, mental or physical.
That is Why the are the Pacific Lions.
yes you are correct I have witnessed this
Current 2023 Mix.
1. Samisoni Frank Simpson Taukei'aho - Tongatapu, Tonga
2. Nepo Eti Laulala - Moto'otua, Samoa
3. Aniseto Ofa He Moori Tuʻungafasi - Nukuʻalofa, Tonga
4. Leicester Ofa Ki Wales Twickenham Fainga'anuku - Nukuʻalofa, Tonga
5. Emoni Narawa - Suva, Fiji
6. Shannon Michael Frizell - Folaha, Tonga
7. Sevuloni Lasei Reece - Nadi, Fiji
More recent others
8. Pita Gus Nacagilevu Sowakula - Lautoka, Fiji
9. Samipeni Finau -Tonga
10. Roger Tuivasa-Sheck - Apia, Samoa
11. Folau Fakatava - Nukuʻalofa, Tonga
12. Sevuloni Lasei Reece - Nadi, Fiji
13. Vaea Tangitau Lapota Fifita - Vavaʻu, Tonga
Others
14. Anesi, Sosene Raymond - Apia, Samoa
15. Brown, Olo Max - Apia, Samoa
16. Clarke, Eroni - Apia, Samoa
17. Collins, Jerry - Apia, Samoa
18. Ieremia, Alama --Apia, Samoa
19. Schuster, Nesetorio Jonny-Apia, Samoa
20. Schwalger, John Evan-Apia, Samoa
21. Tuigamala, Va'aiga Lealuga-Falesiu, Samoa
22. Laulala, Casey Daniel Eti-Moto'otua, Samoa
23. So'oialo, Rodney-Moto'otua, Samoa
24. Toeava, Isaia-Moto'otua, Samoa
25. Solomon, Frank-Pago Pago, American Samoa
26. Muliaina, Junior Malili-Salelesi, Samoa
27. Masoe, Matemini Christopher-Savai'i, Samoa
28. Kaino, Jerome-Tutuila, American Samoa
29. Fekitoa, Malakai Fonokalafi-Ha'apai, Tonga
30. Lauaki, Sione Tuitupu-Ha'apai, Tonga
31. Taumoepeau, Saimone-Ha'apai, Tonga
32. Maka, Isitolo-Longoteme, Tonga
33. Alatini, Pita Faiva-ki-moana-Nuku'alofa, Tonga
34. Riechelmann, Charles Calvin-Nuku'alofa, Tonga
35. Vanisi, Osaiasi Kupu-Nuku'alofa, Tonga
36. Batty, Walter-Tonga, Tonga
37. Halai, Frank-Tonga, Tonga
38. Fraser, Bernard Gabriel-Lautoka, Fiji
39. Jennings, Arthur Grahn-Lautoka, Fiji
40. Solomon, David-Levuka, Fiji
41. Rokocoko, Josevata Taliga-Nadi, Fiji
42. Matson, John Tabaiwalu Fakavale-Nausori Highlands, Fiji
43. Vidiri, Joeli-Nausori Highlands, Fiji
44. Sivivatu, Sitiveni Waica -Suva, Fiji
45. Williams, Ronald Oscar-Suva, Fiji
Rupeni Caucaunibuca played for New Zealand Barbarian, AB's almost got him but he went to Agen and Toulouse. Then rightfully played for Fiji.
Sivivatu, Sitiveni Waica and Lauaki, Sione Tuitupu actually played for the Pacific Islanders rugby union team before been poached.
Only South Africa and Argentina were 100% home grown talent.
Many players move to live somewhere else. That is good no problem.
It is the AB's (the Pacific Lions) with their world class rugby system that poach PI players that is the example that stinks the most. Sure Italy and Scotland are rebuilding.
BUT it begs the question - If you are the best in the world, with a load of money - for 10 year in a row, why do you have to poach key players (fijian wingers, tongan hitmen flankers and samoa flank, mid field or front row)? Stop it.
Scotland (15)
WP Nel (South Africa), Pierre Schoeman (South Africa), Javan Sebastian (England), Ewan Ashman (Canada), Sam Skinner (England), Jack Dempsey (Australia), Hamish Watson (England), Ali Price (England), Ben White (England), Ben Healy (Ireland), Chris Harris (England), Cameron Redpath (France), Sione Tuipulotu (Australia), Kyle Steyn (South Africa), Duhan van der Merwe (South Africa).
Italy (11)
Ivan Nemer (Argentina), Hame Faiva (New Zealand), Dino Lamb (England), David Sisi (Germany), Toa Halafihi (New Zealand), Sebastian Negri (Zimbabwe), Martin Page-Relo (France), Juan Ignacio Brex (Argentina), Ange Capuozzo (France), Monty Ioane (Australia), Paolo Odogwu (England),
Wales (10)
Taulupe Faletau (Tonga), Tomas Francis (England), Dan Lydiate (England), Will Rowlands (England), Henry Thomas (England), Christ Tshiunza (Democratic Republic of the Congo), Gareth Anscombe (New Zealand), George North (England), Nick Tompkins (England), Johnny Williams (England),
New Zealand - the Pacific Lions(9)
Samisoni Taukei'aho (Tonga), Tyrel Lomax (Australia), Nepo Laulala (Samoa), Ofa Tu'ungafasi (Tonga), Shannon Frizell (Tonga), Finlay Christie (Scotland), Emoni Narawa (Fiji), Leicester Fainga'anuku (Tonga), Ethan de Groot (Australia)
Ireland (8)
Finlay Bealham (Australia), Rob Herring (South Africa), Jeremy Loughman (USA), Joe McCarthy (USA), Bundee Aki (New Zealand), Jamison Gibson-Park (New Zealand), Mack Hansen (Australia), James Lowe (New Zealand)
Australia (7)
Taniela Tupou (Tonga), Jordan Uelese (New Zealand), Will Skelton (New Zealand), Lalakai Foketi (New Zealand), Samu Kerevi (Fiji), Marika Koroibete (Fiji), Suliasi Vunivalu (Fiji)
France (5)
Uini Atonio (New Zealand), Sipili Falatea (Futuna), Peato Mauvaka (New Caledonia), Paul Willemse (South Africa), Yoram Moefana (Futuna)
England (4)
Billy Vunipola (Australia), Manu Tuilagi (Samoa), Marcus Smith (Philippines), David Ribbans (South Africa)
South Africa (0)
Argentina (0)
SOURCE
Rugby World Cup: The team with the most players born overseas revealed
Robert van Royen
September 17, 2023
www . stuff . co . nz / sport / rugby-world-cup-2023 / 300948334 / rugby-world-cup-the-team-with-the-most-players-born-overseas-revealed
You make a very good point, one that I’m sure is going to shock many who read your post. I must take issue with you about New Caledonia and Futuna, both of which are French territories. To call players coming from those two locations foreigners is incorrect. They are French.
You’re an fool or raciest if you want to stop New Zealand providing pacific sportsmen and women a future playing rugby
You are making a classic mistake here - not telling apart which players are homegrown insofar as they moved as children to their new country (Christie, Fainga’anuku, Faletau, etc) and project players who were born and raised in a country and then moved overseas as professional rugby players in order to qualify for a different nation (Aki, Lowe, Herring, etc). There’s a massive difference between both groups.
Thanks for the article, Neil. A topic that always brings polar opposites out of the woods ! I believe the three year qualification is enough, and if it were put to a vote for rugby people worldwide, ….which ofc will never happen….it would interesting to see how the result would fall.
I often think those that get hot under the collar over New Zealanders/Boks/Fijians et al playing for another nation are forgetting these men are professionals, playing rugby is their living as young men. It is therefore, in my view, their right to chose who they play for. One could pick any one of CJ Stander, Bundi Aki, JGP, Paul Willemse, and on and on, and ask if they had not moved overseas, would they have made their land of birth national teams. I suspect the answer in many cases would be no, they would not.
Duhan van der Merwe is a good example to look at in this respect. I would judge he still would not make a Bok starting 23 for a crucial game. And that despite his high standing with Scotland. And in his case we, the vast body of rugby “types” of all hues, would be denied seeing a very good, probably even great, rugby player perform at the highest level.
you don’t know what you talking about
Don’t agree. There are plenty of players in South Africa who would be selected for other countries but who are unlikely to ever play for the Bokke. This is a fact of life. Test match rugby is not a circus or a “demonstration bout”; it is a competition between nations. van der Merwe, Nel, Schoeman etc etc playing for Scotland is an abomination. World Rugby’s gift to the weak.
No, the only reason DvdM is in Scotland is because South Africa had to reform for their past wrongs.
Ironically, he is the type of player I could see as being a high target overseas if he had of been able to earn representation in South Africa.
Theres no way around it. The formation of International rugby isn’t all about your nationality. And I am talking here just as much about certain countries refusal to pick players.
I as well want to expand on a couple of your points.
More I would imagine recognize the harm it does the to the game and it’s growth. It’s not a good look for a sport wanting to break into the top echelon of competitive sports.
This problem will persist as long as tests rule the sport. I don’t know what the answer is here, it may be as simple as letting the international game bring fans in and waiting until that transfers to club rugby. Or the stumping up of WR to compensate to the highest level, certainly some of those low countries, like NZ, Australia, and South Africa, might be capable of breaking through to the more fortunate nations, but I can’t see Argentina and South American, or the Pacific ever having the economy to compete for players (and remember that’s done at u18 level now).
A balance skewed the other way just as much is also undesirable in my tastes (ie towards football), so people will have to be careful of any manipulation. We have the Nations leagues coming up, hopefully the club championship is not far behind, and the next thing we should be seeing is the funding of further youth tournaments, taking over 6N, Rugby championship + apcific nations, Americas, by WR leading up to a WC. This will help nations keep their young talent and avoid other Nations from capturing them (pretty much the only means a ‘home’ nation has of retaining players currently).
I do agree that players should be allowed to choose who they play for. Two things I do disagree on though:
1) Rugby players are professionals, and playing rugby is their living. For every foreign born player who plays in a national team there is therefore a homegrown professional losing earning opportunities.
2) I think you’re either massively overestimating how good South African and Kiwi players are, or massively underestimating how good players like DvdM and Aki are.
Frankly I’m much happier about players qualifying through residency than through blood. People who are raised in England are English. People who aren’t are not. Nationality isn’t genetic.
The idea that having a grandparent from somewhere means that you are also from there is a symptom of the kind of idiot identitarianism that used to only hold sway in mainland europe and in settler colonies, but is sadly becoming all the more common in proper countries as well.
That’s ridiculous. England itself has many of its own cultures, to think others don’t exist is arrogance or isolationism on your part.
Why are you happier then? So many examples leave and go straight back home after their International carrier is over don’t they?
Europe would have been the last place I would have thought relevant to that concept. Why was the rule even in place? I agree, there certainly needs to be something extra put in place to ensure that rule is not abused like it is, it should only be an option for individuals whos ethnic identity is actually relevant to them. Something like choosing between (when being locked to a nation) your second nation and residency, or just choosing a second option if youre eligible for multiple (ie you might have 4 options but when you make a nation you are choosing that one, and your second choice)?
I certainly agree though, at 5 years youve certainly shown your dedication to playing to that country. Not that I did it myself, but I felt 3 years was a hill many thought they could grind out, to the detriment of everyone a lot of the time.
This author still doesn’t really get it.
CCS is still a Kiwi, his mates still are Kiwi’s and, I assume, he still talks like a Kiwi, and he can still be an All Black if he thinks he’s good enough. All perspectives the author is still getting wrong. Who can blame him though, he has probably had decades being like everyone else and critizing players for playing for a country they don’t think they should have. The same lack of understanding, of perspective, is still there, now we can just hear an acceptance of it from this guy.
Surprisingly, it doesn’t appear to be examples like these, but those of DvdM, Antonio, and James Lowe (I don’t count JGP and Aki as there probably weren’t considered International quality at the time?) that I am seeing a shift in perspectives from. In any case, it is indeed jumping between club level where this change has been driven and also essentially resolved (stopped) by WRs change in eligibility.
So to sum things up, the 6N will indeed be cleaned up as these players phase out, and supporters that are disillusioned with the status quo will be able to return to some sort of respectability. While the International game will hopefully have that authenticity again there will still be a need to understand a player like Feyi-Waboso wanting to represent both Wales and England, and that if he makes that switch back to Wales, that it is done out of desire rather than not being good enough for England anymore.
The rugby world needs to open up to those circumstances as well as continue to find equality that reduces the occurances of players choosing their national representation based on factors like money.
I suppose for players who switch countries it’s a question of dreams vs reality. Without a doubt the likes of Duhan van der Merwe and James Lowe grew up dreaming of playing for the Boks and the All Blacks respectively. When it became clear that wouldn’t happen they looked elsewhere to play international rugby. Not sure wearing another country’s colours means as much to them as their first choice would have, but can’t blame them for the move.
Certainly not, no. If that is your point, or topic, however, then I also think you need to ask yourself if you think it reflects in their performance. Two points I would argue is whether a player who does make the choice to leave, are they more confident in backing their ability to adapt, and then also, whether it might indicate a lack of natural drive, or aspirations, as those that stay/chosen, and whether that might also reflect on performance.
I wonder if that was the perspective on Country A in Lowe’s case, that he wasnt a player who would die for the jersey (ie adjust his style and play and do whatever they told him to) and there were others who would. Only for Country B (Ireland) to find, that as a high energy player, they founding a way to use his skills, make him a star, earning International recognition, and those exact circumstances have lead the player to have similar reverence towards CB that was desired by CA before they selected him. They’ve now got someone who was confident in his ability and who feels like they owe their country everything.
Sadly, it might not be anymore. ‘Reality’ is going to be the only winner in a world were only one of those exists anymore. Take Nankivill’s case with Ireland. Started by playing well and looks to be the a high skill cap player who can fit their center mold nicely (though he would really have ages to adjust in this scenario anyway), but where someone like Lowe was 31 when a world cup came around Nankivill will be 33 I think, and unlikely be considered for selection, essentially. He might still earn that International cap during the cycle (if he remained in Ireland) but such a player is no longer going to be signed, nor want to be signed, on that prospect alone. With the new 5 year residency it largely removes the chance for players to pursue their dream and still make an impact with a second country. They will have to decide to give up on having a dream before turning professional, like DvdM.
So, such a player as Nankivill or Lowe might not become as important, you might say, but can we expect change, to happen younger? Certainly we would hope that this cleans up the international game for now. An extra 2 years qualification essentially halves the international component a player can expect to earn from being enticed to change/move countries. What we don’t know is if this movement isn’t what has already caused the likes of Ethan Roots or Chandler Cunningham-South to give up on their All Black dreams. Both tried to make the most prestigious club side in NZ and failed, then immediately left the country, and they didn’t even require residency. While I suspect a country like Ireland is going to return to upholding some sort of values, I’m not so sure of ones like France and England, where we are already see big shifts towards youths. In France’s case especially, this is not just from clubs, but a national attention on the Pacific Islands (French colonies mainly).
Colonies or not, that is not going to stop people feeling justified for holding onto their mercenary perspective towards International rugby I suspect.
Indeed. It’s an outcome of globalization. Very fair point.
But it’s also, surely, an outcome of the “adoptive” countries not producing “enough” players. Particularly countries with small player populations. And having the cash and value proposition to attract foreign players. Willing buyer. Willing seller.
I for one think the eligibility rules should be 5 years and/or linked to the player gaining genuine citizenship. Not just residency.
And I think that countries like SA, New Zealand (in particular) should do a better job of picking players before they apply themselves to their new found homes. Unless they’re not good enough. Of course.
SA did that successfully with players like Evan Roos (France) and Feinberg-Mngomezulu (England) to prevent them from leaving the Bok cause. New Zealand should be considering the same approach because they’re ripe for being raided in the future.
Picking players how? Retaining Ethan Roots and CCS?
Have you seen them play? I would just have assumed they would still be selected appropriately, ie not good enough for the Crusaders etc. His situation also looks to be one of natural weeding. His choice rather than “raiding”, which is what the article hints at players have the option and avenues to do. Doesn’t really matter why the raiding is happening though, still has the same effect as all the “raiding” that has gone on in the past.
The move towards what is essentially an international club rugby system seems fairly unavoidable at this point. I do like that it lets players roam, improving their skill set in different areas and becoming better players overall. You can always have exhibition games for players to represent homelands akin to NRL’s State of Origin too.
World Cup is where I get uncomfortable though and I’m not sure having separate rules for RWC and other international games would work well.