Leicester and Saracens show the way for risk-averse England
The clamour for the England head coach to pick the best attacking players is unceasing. There is always a subliminal conviction among English rugby folk that somewhere, somehow ‘we have the players’ – it is just the systems and people around them which are failing. Get those right, and the Red Rose would be a world-beater.
Orchestrating the media chorus more often than not is Sir Clive Woodward, head coach of the only England (or northern hemisphere) side to have hoisted the Webb Ellis Cup back in 2003, and erstwhile contributor to The Daily Mail. If If Henry Arundell represents the attacking conscience of English rugby on the field, Woodward is its ambassador in the media.
Midway through the World Cup, after England had put 71 points on a luckless Chile, Sir Clive opined in his Mail column: “It was the first time I can remember for a long time we have got a team playing with some real pace and real risk. If you ask, can you imagine playing this way against South Africa, Ireland or France, the answer is unequivocally yes. If you have got the coaching and the mindset to do it, you can, and this was a massive step forward.
This is the first time Steve Borthwick has coached a team to play like this and he would have learned a huge amount from last night in Lille. If you were a player, you would have loved playing in that match and the squad members on the sidelines would have been desperate to play in a game like that.”
Arundell scored five tries and Marcus Smith started at full-back, and both made it into the back three Woodward recommended for the knockout stages of the tournament: “With Smith it is about getting your best players on the pitch. My back three would be Arundell, who should have been in the team for a while, on one wing, Freddie Steward on the other and Smith at full-back.”
When push came to shove, as it always does in games against the Springboks, Borthwick reverted to type. Arundell and Smith were gone, and Steward returned to full-back with a pair of relative eminence grises bookending him on the wings in Jonny May and Elliot Daly. That trio won the kicking/fielding battle hands-down and England almost won the game against the eventual champions.
Woodward may well be right about the optimal combination in the back three, but he will never get to see it in any match that matters while Borthwick is the head coach of England. To find his justification for preferring the solid all-rounder-in-the-now to the X-factor-attacker-with-potential-for-the-future, Borthwick need look no further than two key matches from the last round of the Premiership. Leicester Tigers beat up Northampton Saints convincingly at Welford Road 26-17, and Saracens shattered Harlequins 38-10 on their own patch at the Stoop.
Saints and Quins represent, at club level, the attacking U-turn Woodward would like to see England make in international rugby. Saints finished top of the attacking tree in the 2022-23 season with 91 tries, including a league-best 34 scores from turnover. They were one of only three clubs to average over 50% of lightning-quick ball from the breakdown and they averaged one clean break for every 13 rucks they built, two top-notch offensive outcomes.
Saints contain several backs who have been mentioned in England dispatches in recent times – principal among them Tommy Freeman, George Furbank, Fraser Dingwall and Alex Mitchell, who was finally promoted at the World Cup. At Welford Road last Saturday, they dominated the number of carries and rucks, and won the line-break battle by seven breaks to two.
It mattered not one whit. Northampton conceded a grand total of seven penalties and two free-kicks at scrum-time (three of which played through to Tigers’ advantage) in a game where less than 50% of the scrums were completed. As an afterthought, they also gave up three forced fumbles and another six turnovers in the tackle area. As their head coach Phil Dowson commented ruefully: “We didn’t deal with the breakdown in the first half. Discipline in the second half, going down to 13 men, giving 20 penalties away to their 10, makes it very tricky to get a result.
“That penalty count gives them all the pressure and field position and puts us under some heat…
“That anticipation at the breakdown wasn’t good enough and we gave [Tommy] Reffell and [Jasper] Wiese time to get over the ball.”
The cold hard fact is a coach like Borthwick will never embrace a more sophisticated attacking philosophy as long as there are far easier ways to score tries with minimal risk.
Northampton confidently shift the ball into the hands of one of their strongest runners on first phase (Lewis Ludlam), but three Leicester tacklers ensure they create enough ‘litter’ on the wrong side of the tackle area to force the first cleanout player (#7 Tom Pearson) into a winding slalom through bodies. There is no straight shot at the breakdown for Pearson and that gives Wiese time to get on-ball and win the penalty.
Fellow Springbok Handre Pollard stepped up to spear the ball into the left corner, and Tigers finished a 60m scoring ‘move’ via the driving lineout.
Although the try was disallowed for an illegal block ahead of the ball-carrier, that set the tone for the game: over two minutes of ‘play’ with one breakdown pilfer penalty, one kick to the corner and a lineout drive try. Why pick the Arundells and the Smiths of this world, when rugby can be this simple, and so risk-free?
Leicester found an even safer way to score in the second period.
Wait for a penalty advantage to accrue from your scrum before you launch your hulking South African number eight off the base of the set-piece, and convert a zero-risk try from short range a few phases later.
Like Saints, a tranche of Quins’ backs have been touted for national duty – Cadan Murley, Luke Northmore, Lennox Anyanwu and the ubiquitous Smith among them. Even allowing for a new-model red and black army unafraid of launching long-range forays of their own, victory was still based squarely on the ability of North London defence to resist West London attack. Harlequins did not score a try until the 73rd minute of the game, and by that stage the result had long been decided.
Owen Farrell is often criticised for failure to lower his tackle height, but there is very little wrong with his sheer work-rate in defence. It was his appetite to reload which helped deny Quins the edges of the field in which they do their best work.
There are three Quins attackers packed into the left five metre corridor, but because Farrell has covered half the width of the pitch, and run all the way from ruck-side out to the right sideline, the overlap is shut down comprehensively on Alex Dombrandt. In the second instance, he is part of the initial stop on Andre Esterhuizen, but somehow extricates himself from the tackle to cover the space out wide to the next ruck.
Two last-quarter attacks illustrated just how effective Farrell can be with ball in hand when he is supported by a lieutenant as able as Saracens full-back Alex Goode.
In the first example, Farrell is missed out entirely, and although the ball hits Goode high on the inside shoulder he still manages to collect it in stride and shift it on in one slick motion to the wing. In the second Farrell and Goode are split to either side of the ruck, and that creates problems of identification for the defence, with nobody present in the backfield to cover the kick-through on the short-side by Saracens’ full-back.
Every time it looks like Borthwick might be wavering, or growing out and away from his roots in set-piece, defence and the kicking game, something happens to pull him back to the basics. At the World Cup, the sprigs of hope peeping up from the pool match against Chile were snowed under by the spectre of South Africa looming in a tournament semi-final. Borthwick went tumbling back, all the way back to the zero-risk game he truly trusts his charges to play.
Any notion he might have had of introducing new attacking blood for the Six Nations received a swift rebuke – a sharp, burning slap in the chops in round six of the Premiership. Northampton and Harlequins may be regarded as the standard-bearers for a new generation of gallant, devil-may-care young musketeers, but they were put in their place in no uncertain terms by the ‘old firm’ of Tigers and Sarries at Welford Road and the Stoop respectively.
As long as the virtues represented by those two clubs keep winning the silverware, there will be precious little wriggle room in selection for the England head coach, should he decide to squirm, twist and turn on the horns of the dilemma.
Maybe no English supporter can really draw a line through the end of the Eddie Jones era when the ball was “like a ticking time bomb” and all of that. Maybe it really does take an outlier like Woodward to buck the trend. From the lips of the man himself: “There is a big part of me that really wants England to win the World Cup because it allows you to move on.
“While they keep stuffing it up – and they do keep stuffing it up – you look in the mirror and think: ‘I should still be there’.”
Sorry, I didn’t think I’d be commenting on this article but for the sake of Rugby I feel like I need to.
These are some of the most common examples you will see, of what some might call negative sides, but really they should just be seen as less dominant sides. You shouldn’t be rewarded by the opposition breaking your defensive line, and indeed that is the main reason for the above law. While a mauling side can’t be thought of as a less dominant aspect per se, the tactical abusing of the mechanics from lineout mauls, to avoid needing to be able to do the traditional method of busting the opposition defence to score, is certainly negative.It is just the first two (one moment) examples of what went wrong (for Saints?). First, 8 (Duane?) players the ball from offside, gaining crucial time on the weaving cleaner;
The maul laws, not just the tactics that refs let sides get away with, are just far too heavy and unfair against the defending side. Even as the rule book is now however, if everyone in the North just gained familiarity with these concepts, they would just start to fade out of the game there in the places were it is still being held onto. It’s from the seed of the idea that you are just not good enough otherwise. Clive’s belief needs to be embraced if the players are ever to have a winning that will take them to the top of their game.
It’s a shame you only made passing reference to Sarries attacking prowess and their side to side game. They played equally attacking ball as Quins but Sarries defence was better. That is very different to a defence minded game. Three forward and three backs tries for reference. You quoted that Saints were top try scorers last season (84) but who was joint second (along with Quins ironically)? Those two teams who you are espousing their attacking abilities also conceded the most tries last season apart from Falcons. There has to be a balance.
I agree with your points re the England setup but also think you could still have made your point whilst weaving in how the Sarries game has changed in the last 18 months to embrace that attack minded philosophy. You can see where my support lays I suspect 😉
Good article Nick. I think you’re spot on, I hope you’re not, but I think you are!! Boring rugby from England would be bearable if we win the 6N, but then I’d still rather watch quins over sarries, or saints over Leicester any day of the week, despite the result. Quinn’s did manage to win the prem with this style only a few years back now, so it is possible to have the best of both.
Don’t know why Woodward is still used as a pundit talks absolute garbage
I for one would love to see Woodward back as England coach. It would be glorious to see his complete lack of understanding of modern rugby come back to bite him in the arse as he is ignobly sacked after a run of dreadful results.