Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

LONG READ Which Six Nations squad is best prepared to succeed today and in the future?

Which Six Nations squad is best prepared to succeed today and in the future?
1 month ago

There are lots of things about being an international coach which seem complicated, but not picking a squad, right? Surely you just pick the best available players and sit back and see what unfolds. Unfortunately not. Picking a squad isn’t just about performing now, it’s about performing next year and the year after that and the year after that. In this article, with the help of a sports scientist working in the professional game, we will examine squad profiles and how much they matter.

Firstly, what is a squad profile. It’s simply the age and number of caps spread through a squad. If you want to win now, you might aim for an experienced squad with plenty of international experience. That’s probably also going to be an old squad and if those older players have soaked up all the international experience, they may well retire exposing a younger generation ill-suited to the highest level. Yet, pick an inexperienced team with the hope that they grow together and you might end up with a deflated side battered by relentless losses and struggling for direction without those leaders.

Thankfully, we can see these challenges in the data. The below shows us the average number of caps each team possessed in their squads over the last three years. These are box and whisker graphs and without diving into a GCSE maths lesson too much, the box shows us where 50% of all players sit and the horizontal line marks the average.

Let’s look at Ireland and Wales first. Ireland have gradually increased their caps since 2023. This is a sign of Andy Farrell sticking with a core group of players and giving them the experience of regular International rugby. Wales on the other side have dropped experience since that last hurrah of the Gatland era in 2023. They have gone from one of the most experienced sides in 2023 to the least in 2025.

There are negative consequences to Ireland’s approach. They are an ageing team. In 2023 they were already one of the oldest of the 18 sides we are looking at but they are of course older now in 2025. The risk is that they retire, or fall out of form, en masse and a group of inexperienced players are left to pick up the pieces and keep things moving forward. You can see elements of this with Italy. They decided to clear the decks and start afresh with a very young and very inexperienced squad. That paid dividends in 2024 as that new look team lost just two matches. The first time ever they’d lost just twice and the first time since 2013 they’d won twice.

It’s not been so successful for Wales who saw their experience chopped down but are still almost as old as they were in 2023. England have pulled off the trick of getting more experience while also getting younger. Partly that’s caused by a conscious effort to blood in young players they trusted to make a significant impact. In 2023 they had a great block of players with fewer than 20 caps. That block are largely still there but have been gifted experience and are now part of a team which appears to have a clear plan of succession. Players in 2023 who fit that bill would be Marcus Smith, Alex Mitchell, Ben Earl, Ben Curry, and Freddie Steward. Steward, Earl, and Smith now have 30+ caps and Mitchell and Curry look set to close in on that total in the next few years. England had 14 uncapped players in 2023 and 2024, Ireland had just one. Among those uncapped players were Fin Smith, Cadan Murley, and Chandler Cunningham-South all feature this weekend.

France are deserving of their own mention because of just how internationally inexperienced they are. England, Ireland, and Wales have all had at least one 100 capper in their squads since 2023. France haven’t had any and only Gael Fickou and Uini Atonio have had more than 60 caps. It seems they don’t need to play by the same squad planning rules of the other sides, and there’s a good reason for that.

The France squad of 2023 included uncapped players like Leo Coly, Julien Delbouis, and Alexandre Roumat. Coly had played 90 club games prior to that tournament, Delbouis 79, and Roumat 156. Dan Edwards and Ellis Mee, the Welsh uncapped players this year, have played a combined 76, including at Championship level. The French club system allows players the opportunity to bag plenty of elite level action at a young age and before you’ve trotted out for France. This year the French have selected uncapped players like lock Matthias Halagahu who has appeared 59 times for Toulon. Only 20-year-old centre Noah Nene bucks the trend, he’s had just 17 appearances prior to this tournament.

The importance of this is impossible to overlook. The likes of Wales, Scotland, and to a certain extent Ireland, must focus on that planned succession. That means identifying early the person who will takeover from your older experienced player. Then giving them starts against weaker opponents and meaningful gametime off the bench. Once the older player is gone you then hope the next in line will thrive. The risks of this are enormous though. Your young talent might not thrive or injuries might jump in the way of progress. Then you need to scramble to find someone who can fill the gap. France can employ that approach as well, but if it doesn’t work they have a boatload of players in the Top14 who can at least fill the gap during injury or when development time is needed.

We can look at the specifics of this year’s squads in the above graphic. Notice the conveyor belt style patterns for both Ireland and England. Those show the three groups; old and experienced, younger with mid-levels of experience, and young with little to no experience. Over time you expect the top group to retire and be replaced by the middle group who are themselves replaced by the young group. Italy are in the early stages of building, or rebuilding, that process. France as we have discussed are an outlier. Scotland however have some cause for concern.

Scotland’s 2025 squad are interesting because they have a lot of people with some experience, but few with lots of experience. This is perhaps caused by the famous “Toonie Tombola” where regular chopping and changing means that a lot of players have been given gametime and there’s a wide base of talent they can choose from. However, look at the number of players who are over 30 but with fewer than 40 caps. That includes almost the entire front row. Players of course develop at different rates and things like injury or a lack of opportunities can mean someone has to wait until later in their career to make their debut. All of these Scottish players are deserving of their call-ups. The concern is that your older but less experienced players give way to another generation of older but less experienced players who give way to another group like that. You might then miss out on giving experience to the younger players, who perhaps aren’t quite match ready, in pursuit of prioritising immediate success.

This is caused by a relatively small player pool, as we can see with Italy and Wales. With a small player pool there is a lower chance that each generation will throw up a test worthy player in each position. If your young intake doesn’t have that elite fly-half then you had better keep your older fly-half in action and hope he can go long enough for a young talent to emerge. That’s not the case for England and Ireland. It’s almost certain that each generation will have each position covered. If you have a fly-half you rate 7/10 who is 22 and another 7/10 who is 33, it might be pertinent to begin giving experience to the 22-year-old with a view to four years down the line when your 33-year-old is long retired.

As fans we talk a lot about team and squad selections. Intuitively we know that it’s important to have a plan for the future. But this is critical for team bosses who need to balance winning now and winning later. Nail that and you’ll have a long future and happy fans. But it’s all too easy to fall short thanks to the unpredictability of the sport and factors outside of your control. Looking ahead to this year, if you’re in the England or Italy camp you’ll be feeling pretty buoyed that you’re on the right track.

Thank you to Jake Gillies for pulling together the stats and graphs we’ve used in this article.

Download the RugbyPass app now!

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

Comments

6 Comments
B
Bull Shark 29 days ago

I’ve said it for some time that France will emerge the top European side and will go to the WC favourites (again) in 2027.


If anyone was unlucky to have lost by one point against the Boks in 2023 it was France. That QF was the game of the tournament and both teams played brilliantly. Had France won, they’d have gone on to be world champions and I wouldn’t have to keep reminding everyone how good they still are.

J
JW 29 days ago

The importance of this is impossible to overlook. The likes of Wales, Scotland, and to a certain extent Ireland, must focus on that planned succession. That means identifying early the person who will takeover from your older experienced player.

That's not really how it works. I think it is far more likely this is due to a lack of quality (quantity basically), and funds. More players means less shared caps. Interesting topic though and Wales look both inexperienced and young, as in they don't both correlate like the other teams, in that last graph!

f
fl 29 days ago

"France are deserving of their own mention because of just how internationally inexperienced they are... It seems they don’t need to play by the same squad planning rules of the other sides, and there’s a good reason for that."


I actually disagree with this. First, while France have a complete dearth of highly experienced veterans, their median number of caps isn't that much lower than most other sides, and this year is higher than Wales, and possibly equal to England. To the extent though that France are an inexperienced side, that does appear to have hurt them though. Given their incredible depth, and the incredible talent of so many of their players, they actually haven't achieved as much in the Galthié era as they might have hoped. After the 2023 RWC Galthié himself seemed to recognise that this was a result of inexperience, and spoke about wanting to emulate south africa in building an experienced squad for 2027. So its not that France don't need to play by the same rules as other sides, but that they have had other priorities but are now transitioning towards a more standard model for squad building.

f
fl 29 days ago

great article!

Interesting that only England and Italy have managed to reduce median squad age while increasing median squad caps since 2023. That seems to bode well for both teams!


I am very surprised that 4 of the 6 teams have increased median caps since 2023. World cup years are generally when teams are assumed to peak in terms of experience, and Lions years are generally when teams are assumed to select more experimental squads.

s
sean.kilfoyle 29 days ago

You kind of allude to it here but it seems like France is clearly set up best for both short, medium, and long-term. Why? Cause of the Top 14. Providing tons of elite-level matches at club level that other nations simply do not have access to.

J
JD Kiwi 29 days ago

The big problem is the ten month soap opera. It prevents players from being at their best when they're needed the most and leads to injuries and unavailablity which prevents players from racking up the caps. So however good their players are there's a big risk that they won't fill their potential.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
Search