Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Spare me the Roger Tuivasa-Sheck gossip, his NRL days are done

Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images

I don’t often laugh out loud while reading something.

Especially not when the comments aren’t intended to be funny.

But I had to chuckle last week, when catching up with news that Roger Tuivasa-Sheck was potentially in contract talks to re-join the Sydney Roosters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s rewind a little first.

Tuivasa-Sheck once had the rugby league world at his twinkling feet. Had he stayed a Rooster, he would probably be spoken about now as the finest player in that code.

Having begun his NRL career on the wing, where he won a title in 2013, Tuivasa-Sheck inherited Anthony Minichiello’s fullback jersey, establishing himself as one of the code’s brightest stars.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Only, he wanted to go home.

No matter how rosey the future at the Roosters, under coach Trent Robinson, and how likely it was the club would win more NRL titles, Tuivasa-Sheck had had enough of Sydney.

History shows us the club bought James Tedesco as his replacement, won the 2018 and 2019 Grand Finals, and remain one of the game’s great clubs.

I’ve argued that joining the New Zealand Warriors marked the end of Tuivasa-Sheck’s career as an elite athlete. That once he put his personal life ahead of his football, it was all over.

Now, he was still a good Warrior. My word he was.

ADVERTISEMENT

But when Covid hit and the club became based in Australia, Tuivasa-Sheck walked out on them too. And not at the end of a campaign either.

No, despite being captain of the club and with games remaining in the season, he went back to Auckland.

So spare me this idea that Tuivasa-Sheck would be keen to move back across the Tasman.

The dots just don’t connect.

Related

Rugby gave him the soft-landing he needed. The chance to be based out of Auckland, still be paid well and still be in a team environment.

To me, that was a commercial decision on New Zealand Rugby’s (NZR) behalf. They saw a rival business’ product and added it to the stockpile, without much thought for whether it would work.

ADVERTISEMENT

I don’t know the terms of Tuivasa-Sheck’s NZR contract. I don’t know if All Blacks coach Ian Foster is commercially-obliged to include him in squads.

What I do know is Foster doesn’t appear to have much fondness for him as a rugby player and that the chances he ever becomes a regular member of the starting side look scant.

Tuivasa-Sheck is 29, his best footballing days are behind him and he doesn’t appear to have the all-round game favoured among All Blacks backs.

It was interesting to see Auckland played him on the wing against Taranaki, because I’m really not sure he’ll ever make an elite second five-eighth.

Tuivasa-Sheck’s contract with NZR expires next year and then who knows? Maybe there’ll be a compelling enough offer from Japanese rugby to tempt him overseas once again?

But I don’t see an NRL club offering him $700,000 to a million or him wanting to go through the rigours of that competition again.

Certainly not the Roosters, where you have Tedesco, Joseph Manu and Joseph Sua’ali’i all able to play fullback instead.

Maybe Tuivasa-Sheck can become a serviceable rugby union backline utility. Maybe Foster does develop a confidence in him and he does become a trusted bench option.

I’d be surprised. But then I was dead-set shocked when Tuivasa-Sheck traded the Roosters for the Warriors all those years ago.

We all want Tuivasa-Sheck to be good at rugby. We all remember the Rooster he was and all hope to see that calibre of football from him again.

He truly was a joy to watch and an inspiration to age-group players on both sides of the Tasman.

Rugby league was the code that enabled him to express his outrageous talent best and no rugby union coach appears to have scratched the surface of that.

But Tuivasa-Sheck’s back in Auckland, he’s earning a good whack and maybe he’s happy with that.

Instead of wondering what the future might bring him, perhaps the rest of us should accept he’s quite content with the present.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 hour ago
'Absolute madness': Clive Woodward rips into Borthwick in wake of NZ loss

Borthwick is supposed to be the archetypical conservative coach, the guy that might not deliver a sparkling, high-risk attacking style, but whose teams execute the basics flawlessly. And that's OK, because it can be really hard to beat teams that are rock solid and consistent in the rugby equivalent of "blocking and tackling".


But this is why the performance against NZ is hard to defend. You can forgive a conservative, back-to-basics team for failing to score tons of tries, because teams like that make up for it with reliability in the simple things. They can defend well, apply territorial pressure, win the set piece battles, and take their scoring chances with metronomic goal kicking, maul tries and pick-and-go goal line attacks.


The reason why the English rugby administrators should be on high alert is not that the English team looked unable to score tries, but that they were repeatedly unable to close out a game by executing basic, coachable skills. Regardless of how they got to the point of being in control of their destiny, they did get to that point. All that was needed was to be world class at things that require more training than talent. But that training was apparently missing, and the finger has to point at the coach.


Borthwick has been in the job for nearly two years, a period that includes two 6N programs and an RWC campaign. So where are the solid foundations that he has been building?

4 Go to comments
N
Nickers 1 hour ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Very poor understanding of what's going on and 0 ability to read. When I say playing behind the gain line you take this to mean all off-loads and site times we are playing in front of the gain line???


Every time we play a lot of rugby behind the gain line (for clarity, meaning trying to build an attack and use width without front foot ball 5m+ behind the most recent breakdown) we go backwards and turn the ball over in some way. Every time a player is tackled behind the most recent breakdown you need more and more people to clear out because your forwards have to go back around the corner, whereas opposition players can keep moving forward. Eventually you run out of either players to clear out or players to pass to and the result in a big net loss of territory and often a turnover. You may have witnessed that 20+ times in the game against England. This is a particularly dumb idea inside your own 40m which is where, for some reason, we are most likely to employ it.


The very best ABs teams never built an identity around attacking from poor positions. The DC era team was known for being the team that kicked the most. To engineer field position and apply pressure, and create broken play to counter attack. This current team is not differentiating between when a defence has lost it's structure and there are opportunities, and when they are completely set and there is nothing on. The reason they are going for 30 minute + periods in every game without scoring a single point, even against Japan and a poor Australian team, is because they are playing most of their rugby on the back foot in the wrong half.

43 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search