Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The Best Hits And Biggest Brawls In Kangaroos Vs Kiwis History

Isaac Luke

New Zealand and Australia face off in an historic rugby league test match in Perth on Saturday night. To get in the mood Jamie Wall presents some of the best hits and biggest brawls in the history of this bitter rivalry.

ADVERTISEMENT

When it comes to Kangaroos vs Kiwis test matches we could talk about the incredible tries. The thrilling finishes. The big showdowns that lived up to the hype and more.

But today let us celebrate the glorious shoulder charges, brawls and outright intimidation that has made these two teams squaring off against each other into appointment viewing.

 
NOVINTLBANNER

 

1982: Kevin Tamati levels Rohan Hancock
You only had to get back five metres in 1982, but that’s all the Kiwi prop needed to destroy his opposite number. This textbook shoulder charge sent Hancock horizontal and is perhaps this is what made Tamati a marked man in years to come.

1985: Chain link fence brawl
Tamati was back in the action three years later, this time responding to alleged racial taunts from Kangaroo prop Greg Dowling. After both being sent from the field, the two resumed throwing bombs at each other on the sideline, egged on by a hyped up Lang Park crowd thirsty for blood.

1986: The Kiss of pain
Even though fighting is usually reserved for the big men up front, wingers sometimes get themselves involved too. Kangaroo Les Kiss makes the most of someone being held down in this scrap at the Sydney Cricket Ground and delivers three sneaky uppercuts, before quickly exiting the scene.

ADVERTISEMENT

1989: The only time you’ll see a Kiwi fly
‘The King’ Wally Lewis had a special disregard for New Zealanders. Unfortunately for Kiwi Darrell Williams, it manifested itself into an atomic level hit during the ‘89 level Trans-Tasman series. Williams is the first New Zealander to play on a premiership winning team, a Kiwi selector and NRL judiciary board member, but unfortunately this quick trip to the turf is what he’s most remembered for.

2005: Cameraman, Mason cop it big time
Two in one here from what at the time was a rare Kiwi win. First Aussie winger Matt King gets up and picks a fight with the wrong guy, sparking off a brawl that ends up claiming a camera as collateral damage. Then current Kiwis coach David Kidwell earns a standing ovation from the Mount Smart crowd for levelling Willie Mason with a colossal shoulder charge, after Mason had made the cardinal sin of laughing during the pre-game haka.

2009: David vs Cheap Shot Goliath
Grubmeister general Paul Gallen initially decided to try and decapitate Issac Luke with a swinging arm. When that missed, he worked over the Kiwis hooker, which naturally kicked off a brawl in which both landed a few on each other. However, the real highlight is human missile Adam Blair, so desperately keen to join in the fun he launches off his feet after a 40m run up.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkkN8e3QI_A

2010: Brawl at the break
A heavy shot on Roos fullback Billy Slater to end the first half of the Four Nations final is what started this scuffle, with players coming from everywhere to try their luck with some wild punches. Kiwis lock Greg Eastwood channels his inner Les Kiss and throws an overhand right, only to retreat into the role of peacemaker moments later.

2015: Hit like a girl
The growth of women’s league in both Australia and New Zealand has been heartening over the last few years, however what’s really put them in the spotlight is that they love smacking the hell out of each other (except legally) just as much as the men.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
J
JW 11 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search